HE practice of lathe-turning columns or balusters is of ancient origin,, in England, as we have seen in earlier chapters. It has also been pointed out that turning was little used in Gothic woodwork, in its prime, and that the square, or diamond-sectioned and moulded baluster or mullion was employed, in preference, in chancel and other screens. It is revived, as a novelty, during the reign of Henry \ III and in the seventeenth century becomes the usual method of fashioning legs of chairs and tables or the baluster of cupboards. It is also used, with considerable effect, in the decoration of flat pilasters, in the fashion known as the " split-baluster," or the boss, generically termed " strap-and-jewel " work.
It was inevitable that the lathe, once used as a general thing, would be improved upon and that new methods, such as the slide-rest for spiral turning, would be devised. In the chairs of the later seventeenth century, turning plays a very important part,, as it is the fashions of the legs rather than of the carving which indicate a definite period,, often within a margin as narrow as a single decade. The slide-rest itself is an ingenious but very simple tool which may be described here for the benefit of the uninitiated. If a plain turned baluster (an ordinary desk ruler may serve) be centred in a lathe and allowed to revolve, a lead pencil held rigidly in the one position will make a ring round the ruler as it turns. If, however, the pencil be moved laterally, say, from left to right, the line which it makes will spiral round the ruler from one end to the other. .Moved slowly, the spiralling will be very close, but it will expand the faster the pencil be moved. Let us replace the pencil, which merely marks, by a gouge or chisel which cuts, and a twist will be produced, more or less regular, according to the even character of the lateral movement. Substitute for the chisel held with the free hand a cutting tool in a slide-rest, the lateral travel of which can be accurately proportioned to the chuck-revolution of the lathe, and it will be seen that every variety of twisting, either in long or short spirals, can be produced with ease and certainty.
That twist-turning on the lathe does not appear as a fully-developed art we have seen in a previous chapter. Numbers of chairs and small tables were made, even as late as the first years of the Restoration, with bobbin-turned legs, and these must be
regarded as the prototypes of the later lathe-twist. Figs. 296 and 297, from Lyme Park, may be cited here as typical examples of this bobbin turning. Both stool and chair are in beech, stained black, and while the former has been made with a caned-seat to hold a squab cushion, the latter has been expressly7 devised for fixed upholstery. Both may be regarded as the last phase of the Cromwellian manner. The true Restoration chair, which is nearly always in walnut, is characteristic and unmistakable. Figs. 298 and 299 illustrate the features of this style, which persists from 1600 to about 1680-5, as a fashion, although copies were made at a later date. It is rare, however, in the ease of the latter, to find the Restoration details without any intrusion of later features, which will be described at a subsequent stage. Although the details of the pure Restoration chair can be studied in these two illustrations, it may be as well to point them out, and to emphasise them here, in order that any innovations can be easily remarked in later examples after about 1O80.
These two chairs have framed backs, with the cresting fixed between the squares of the outer balusters, instead of being dolvelled on them in the later manner. The back forms one complete frame with carved styles and rails, sometimes pierced through, as in Fig. 298, more rarely cut in the solid, as in Fig. 299. Perhaps because of the general satisfaction at the revival of the monarchy in England, a favourite motif in these chairs is the royal crown, flanked by amorini. This may be remarked in the cresting of Fig. 298, but it is not rare to find the crown introduced in the upright styles of the back framing, and the stretcher uniting the front legs. So general was the use of this device, that Fig. 299 is rare from the absence of its use anywhere on the chair.
The legs, both at front and back, are spiral-turned, with squares carved, on the fronts only, with patera. The arms have a long graceful sweep, scrolling over at their
Fig. 296. BEECH CHAIR.
Although apparently confined within narrow limits, this Restoration style of walnut chair, permitted of considerable variety, in details, although not in general appearance. There is, at the same time, a wide diversity in quality, from the extremely rich and finely carved to the positively crude. It is usual, but by no means a justifiable, procedure, to dub all these crude chairs as provincial in make, but it is curious to note that where an actual maker can be singled out, either by a label on the chair itself (rare but not unknown) or by the means of an inventory or account, it is the village maker who is often responsible for the richest and best executed specimens.
One of these crude (one might almost say cheap) Restoration chairs is shown in Fig. 300, showing, however, the original state of the seat and back panels and the use of the crown on the back cresting and the front stretcher. The projection of the front legs above the framing of the seat was a device to hold a flat squab cushion in position.
c. 1660. Capt rhe Hon. Richard Legh.
c. 1660. Capt rhe Hon. Richard Legh.
There is every reason to believe that flat cushions, usually covered with velvet, were made for these chairs originally, as the proper finish to the seat.
Fig. 301 is the aristocratic type of the same model, one of four from Cassioburv Park, probably original to the house and made prior to the appointment of the Earl of Essex as Lord-Lieutenant of Ireland. The upholstery of the seats is a later addition, a replacement of worn caning, but these chairs, otherwise, are in their original condition and of fine quality. They are typical of the first ten years of the Restoration and show the kind of furniture which was made for the large houses at this date.
It would be useless here to illustrate a procession of these walnut Charles II chairs,
3 ft. ioi ins. floor to top of back. 2 ft. oI ins. across front of seat.
Date about 1660-5.
3 ft. io ins. floor to top of back. 2 ft. across front of seat.
as they differ, as a rule, very little in form or detail, although varying considerably in quality, but such variation is often not apparent in a small illustration. It is more instructive, however, to show the departures from the type which were then introduced from the Continent, Holland, Flanders, Portugal and Spain.
The two rich chairs, Figs. 302 and 303, from Belton House, show these foreign details in a very striking manner. Chief of these is the Flemish curve, which, when used for the shaping of front
Fig-. 301. WALNUT ARM-CHAIR.
Fig-. 301. WALNUT ARM-CHAIR.
The Earl of Es^R.
legs, rapidly evolves into the cabriole form. This can be noticed in the arm balusters and the front legs of both of these chairs, and in the stretcher-rail of Fig. 303 it is still further emphasised. These later chairs, although still of Charles II period, were frequently made for upholstery on the seat and in the back panel, instead of the former caning, although the latter does not lose its popularity until almost the end of the seventeenth century. It is with the years following 1680 that we enter what may be described
as the era of gorgeous fabrics, and one event in France, partly religious and partly political, must be noted here, as it has an important bearing on the later development of English furniture. This is the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes, and the persecution of the Huguenots which immediately followed.
It was Henry of Navarre who, on the 13th of April, 1590, granted permission to the Protestants of France to worship openly, wherever Protestant communities existed, to establish churches, except in Paris and its environs, to maintain colleges and universities, and to enjoy complete religious liberty. Although threatened and oppressed by Richelieu, and in turn by Mazarin and Colbert, it remained for Louis NIV to revoke the edict, under the influence of a corrupt and hypocritical penitence, on 18th October, 1685. Although actually accomplished at that date, the storm, had threatened for some five or six years before, and many had fled from France to avoid the persecution which they
Was this article helpful?
THIS book is one of the series of Handbooks on industrial subjects being published by the Popular Mechanics Company. Like Popular Mechanics Magazine, and like the other books in this series, it is written so you can understand it. The purpose of Popular Mechanics Handbooks is to supply a growing demand for high-class, up-to-date and accurate text-books, suitable for home study as well as for class use, on all mechanical subjects. The textand illustrations, in each instance, have been prepared expressly for this series by well known experts, and revised by the editor of Popular Mechanics.